Stopping a Case Before It Reaches the Jury in El Paso

West Texas Trial Lawyers, PLLC Files Directed Verdict Motions and Drafts Jury Charges for Criminal Defendants in West Texas & Surrounding Areas.

West Texas Trial Lawyers, PLLC represents clients at the critical juncture when the prosecution has finished presenting its case and the court must decide whether the evidence is legally sufficient to proceed. You may face charges where the state has failed to prove one or more elements of the offense, even if a jury has been seated. A motion for directed verdict argues that no reasonable jury could convict based on the evidence presented. If the court grants the motion, the case ends without deliberation. If the motion is denied, the carefully crafted record of objections and legal argument becomes part of your appellate protection.

Directed verdict motions require precise legal analysis of the elements of the charged offense and a clear showing that the prosecution has not met its burden. Your attorney must identify which elements lack supporting evidence and argue that the deficiency is fatal to the case. This is not a matter of weighing credibility or comparing competing narratives. The question is whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could support a conviction. Even when the motion is denied, making the argument preserves the issue for appeal and signals to the jury that the defense contests the sufficiency of the state's proof.

If you are facing trial and believe the prosecution's evidence is weak or incomplete, contact West Texas Trial Lawyers, PLLC to discuss whether a directed verdict motion is appropriate in your case.

Why Jury Instructions Shape the Outcome

You depend on the jury receiving accurate, legally sound instructions that define the charges, explain the burden of proof, and clarify what must be proven for conviction. West Texas Trial Lawyers, PLLC drafts proposed jury charges and objects to instructions that are misleading, incomplete, or biased in favor of the prosecution. The language used in the charge can determine whether the jury understands the law correctly or applies an incorrect standard to the facts.

After the jury charge is finalized and read to the panel, you will see whether the instructions accurately reflect the law and your theory of defense. A properly drafted charge may narrow the scope of what the jury can consider, exclude improper theories of liability, or clarify the definition of intent or knowledge. A flawed charge can lead to conviction even when the evidence does not support it. Objecting to erroneous instructions preserves the issue for appeal and creates a record that appellate courts can review.

The process of settling the jury charge involves collaboration and dispute between the defense, prosecution, and court. Your attorney submits proposed instructions, objects to the state's proposals, and argues for language that accurately reflects the applicable law. In some cases, the court may refuse a requested instruction or include one over objection. Each decision must be preserved on the record. Strategic narrowing of charges where possible can reduce the risk of conviction on theories not supported by the evidence.